RUSSIAN OLIGARCH: necrophage OR THE HEALER?

 

 When the great revolutionary, the philosopher and anarchist Pierre Zhozef Prudon in 1840 has shocked Paris and the world by the slogan blasting ground «the Property there is a theft!» - yes... So he generally did not mean that property which one the thief has just filched at other citizen and has pronounced the. He meant breaking of "natural death" and legitimised the state assignment of another's materialised labour. (Interested persons can read it «That such the property».)

  

How among fellow tribesmen and fellow citizens very rich and even shockingly rich person at all times was formed?
  Mode maiden. The most healthy collected fighters and went to plunder the enemy. In case of good luck returned with a property pile, and the abrupt chief by the right of an arm, character and command dragged most, sometimes - it is much more. If the tsar - so on a broader scale could become rich from an aggressive campaign. But also warriors who is alive remained, things got hold. More shortly, there was an oligarch or some oligarchs, but blanket material level of the population also rose a little. Gold, tissues, slaves, flocks, upkeep sphere educes also art echoes for money.
  Mode of the second. The most healthy collected pioneers (without ties, but with the weapon) and went to run in incult and long-fallow lands. India, either Siberia, or America. These trailblazers were cut with local population, die from a fever, dug gold and melted together a precious arbour. And some lucky mans and toughness-mans wildly grew rich. Drove on the old native land argentum and furs caravans and asked humbly. Became governors, deputies, princes of new lands. And, besides, the material standard of well-being round them and on the old native land rose. Well - there was a gold not were earlier, argentum, an ebony, pies sable abrasive cloths and diamonds, not speaking about overseas tissues and tobacco.
  Mode the third. The most enterprising, vigorous, clever, greedy, strong-willed - longly sniffed up air, bowed to a sovereign and borrowed money from merchants. And then put in Urals Mountains production plants, poured copper and cast iron, got weapon manufacturing, burnt a lump charcoal, achieved affixion of peasants to production plants... The bloodsucker! But to it - there was a level ground and peasants with wooden ploughs on margins. And after it, millionaire in gold towers, there was a city, business, production plants, power of growing power.
  Mode the fourth. To devise something such that all used, and to you from that on copeck millions dripped. Here so, say, the colonel the Colt has patented and has untwisted a six-warhead revolver. Or Singer, the sly fellow, longly thought - and has patented only a needle with an eye not in heel, and in a spont at an edge. But without it any sewing-machines are impossible! And in the world producers and sellers of sewing-machines unfastened all to Singer, and there was it the multimillionaire. But they, devil take it, hoisted progress: soldiers in the low-cost moulding box burnt sheafs from low-cost revolvers! A civilisation! And all round it worked, were fed, money received!
  Mode the fifth. To become an aster in the field of something, that the people like and agree for show to pay. Well-known charioteers in Ancient Rome were richer and most famous than present pop stars: it gold statues sometimes put! But these singers and sportsmen - yield people show, round them huge commands of organizers and service staff are fed, and spectators should exert to earn money for the ticket! That is: they create a kind of business and also life raise the level. Perhaps foolish, but raise: entertain and boost.
  Mode sixth. To be hired to a sovereign (to the governor, the president, the government) on a large post for fulfilment something large and necessary. To conquer Crimea. Either caucasus. Or Egypt. Or Armenia. Or to depress revolution in Austro-Hungary. Or in Poland. Thus the commander routinely acquires trophies as the sparrow would acquire the peacock plumes. I.Vo-pervyh, a sovereign and the senate favour to the winner and the multiplier of our lands and our glory many money and good things. Secondly, it is accepted to look through dactyls at the man of courage who has handed over in treasury mass of good, but also not forgotten. Well, the honey flow has given away. But - and itself has become rich, and in treasury and power lost head.
  Count Potyomkin was the oligarch! But to Russia ministered and stand smb in good stead!
  Menshikov was the thief and the oligarch! And on the emperor and power growth ploughed also the blood did not feel sorry!
  Drake has plundered the Spanish colonies so, that the ship from gold in water sank. But a fraction to the queen and treasury has unfastened as it is necessary! England grew rich together with it!
  Well and so, when we speak today "oligarchs", we mean people who at us are transferred under the discharge to the third. Captains and holders of the industry, economy. 
  Here Andrew Carnegie. The king of a steel. At him the American steel industry became heavy-lift and forward in the world. It has organised it, has twirled, has adjusted, co-ordinated. Without it there could not be in any way what he possessed.
  Here Krupps. It they have made the German artillery and the German armour awesome and well-known. To them this industry at Germans was on a broader scale in a germ.
  Here Nobels. They have found it and have placed money in reconnaissance and development of the Baku petroleum placers, they have organised construction of refineries and petrol carriers, they have created a net of kerosene benches across all Russian empire. And blasting gelatine Alfred Nobel has devised itself! Though than engineers and hard workers under it was more narrow to line. Without Nobel - to Nobel - on site their empires there was an empty place. Nobody worked there, was not fed, nothing operated.
  And here the Ivanovo print manufactories. And here the Tula small-arms factories. And here Lensky gold placers. Their holders became oligarchs. So after them business remains.
  And all these businessmen - operated hired workers. Also pocketed a surplus value unit. And without them hired workers at all would not have where to be hired and sucked a pad, sitting on a palm tree.
  THE BUSINESSMAN IS A SINERGETICHESKY DEVICE OF ECONOMY
  Means it is unique the mind, character, capabilities - the businessman will organise people so, that they start in an organised way to work, creating a manufacturing resource base, giving away a yield, raising a material standard of living and the adjoining population of region, and at one with all it enriching the businessman.
  Not always at one. Oh not always! And English "walling in" remember, when «sheep have eaten people»? Let the peasants driven from land will take rest, but the wool will bring in the income to new ground landlords. And beggars sharecroppers, and poor almost dead bodies-miners? Wherefore the main law of the businessman - the law of the max lost head, yes?
  But - people stained. And economy hoisted!
  All all already have perceived.
  Let's address to our native Russian oligarchs.
  And what they have created? What has arisen for fifteen years such that to them - was not? Did not stand? Did not work? Did not feed people?
  ANYTHING!.
  And so, misters.
  It is that event when the property is theft.
  Always was, that the rich man has acquired the oof: let it is severe, artful, bloodsucker, but it made something on the organisation of the business, was a bracing small screw on which one all business was kept, it was it housekeeping a plan, its sending on errands will, its ability to interweave such system of stimulants that people worked to it on advantage.
  Russian oligarchs have not created anything.
  Russian oligarchs have come on the ready.
  They are variags. Aggressors. A landing from Mars. Impostors.
  Always the oligarch acted as the organizer of the relations of production producing its status. At us: there were no relations of production, and the future oligarch in producing the future status did not participate in any way.
  And when fulfilling money of the parent-oligarch the little fool-pseudo-democrat from the next newspaper tries to tell, that «the good oligarch» «has created the transparent company», «feeds the people», «pays the greatest salaries» and «attends to philanthropy», I would like to ask it: so that the oligarch has created, except papers? Wherefore «campaign building» is in our event purely term of law meaning transition of the property from one arms in others, from one steering in other, only and all.
  Therefore it is not a pity to me of Khodorkovsky.
  It is a pity to me, that together with it all Russian "oligarchs" do not sit.
  It is a pity to me of those whom they have plundered.
  It that - walked with geological prospecting on a taiga? It was guzzled by biting insects, he dragged half a year a backpack in forty kilogrammes, slept in tent, took samples?
  It pushed the go-anywhere vehicle through a mud, put tubes, bored driven wells, got tank cars? Put a piece of iron, dug the beds under houses? Designed tube rolling, discovered rates of arc welders? It punched reconnaissance and development plans, knocked out funds?
  The Russian petroplacers at the Soviet power yielded more naphthas, than today. Also have been worn less out in the equipment. Also substantiate in itself work of all people, and lay in the land which conquered and has been run in by all people.
  It concerns and to Norilsk nickel. And to Krasnoyarsk aluminium. And so on.
  If Khodorkovsky has organised reconnaissance of fields, both boring, and the equipment of placers, both a transportation network, and delivery of hard workers, - is shorter, would create what to it was not, let naphtha in land is hidden and was, of course, is there would be an another matter. It is its work has twirled business, it he has managed to create to itself (himself) a status.
  Allow? And if tomorrow annihilate all oligarchs - that, naphtha to go will cease? And if they and at all were not - that, naphtha without them would not be?
  What is in Russia today such that would not be without oligarchs? And anything.
  Misters. Their "property" existed to them and without them, is created irrespective of them, and all its founders, all is absolute those who anyhow the work participated in building of "property" of present oligarchs, at this building about the future oligarchs did not suspect, in a sort no them had, under their slightest influencing were not.
  Also note: anywhere in an open press, never, on how much - the information on how have created statuses our oligarchs did not slip. Whence a seed capital? How gained money? How participated in auction?
  If you the talented and fair businessman - that to be ashamed: present and tell, how you, the simple Soviet engineer or the doctor, became the billionaire. Admire the world with the genius and good luck! If you the swindler in the world of swindlers and in days of swindlers - so not to you to sing about the right and morals: you have gone to games where only one right and only one morals - to snatch the most major chunk. Has snatched? - Well done Now it at you have snatched together with cogs? - Means, any more the good fellow.
  Reformers and oligarchs wanted so: we steal only once, and we will live then fairly. A horse-radish to you. It is enough to steal once to become the thief. Obscurely? You steal single-passly, and the thief for life.
  Misters oligarchs. All of you thieves. Dexterity and cynicism you have stolen that is a materialised labour of all - all - the people.
  «It is impossible to scrap privatisation results» - means in transfer on colloquial Russian: who that has stolen - yield all we will abandon the stolen. I iterate: to seed not that people have created - and that to collect back - back to collect! - that thieves to themselves have pocketed! The odds is, impudent idiots?
  Reformers thought that? What is the oligarchs will start to manage in a market way, more rationally, efficiency and is civilised, than at the sphacelated socialism. But reformers in the illiteracy have mixed liberalism with anarchy, and the market with vulgar sotsial-Darvinism.
  Oligarchs, in full accordance with objective laws of economy, have jerked on a straight line to the max lost head. Also began to tear and guzzle that remains from the USSR.
  He is Henry Ford - Maiden could create the civilised market, a formation in a complex production plants with pipelines, hospitals and kindergartens for children of the hard workers. Behind Ford there were the decades of class battles shot by national guards of strike, the lock-outs broken by crow bars of an arm of finks, a working career from the bottom, business building by the arms and a condanguinity continuity with a native land.
  If you compare 1990 with 2004 on all main economic indicators it is clearly visible, that manufacturing wears out, the equipment does not regenerate, bowels are exhausted, delivery capacity more low, than was, and mad money merges from domestic economy abroad.
  Who there was fed by liver Prometey?
  The oligarch is without delay fed by a body of the USSR, rather than resuscitates it.
  Its manufacturing was to it, both worked better, and was maintained more carefully.
  Workers with whom the oligarch "feeds", actually feed him: to it and without it they worked too, and lived better.
  "Philanthropy" to which one the oligarch attends is an insignificant percent of money which one the oligarch has stolen at the state as a tax dodging.
  That is. The oligarch as has created nothing that, but was the genius of consumption.
  RUSSIAN OLIGARCH - NOT CREATOR, BUT THE CONSUMER READY
  Its essence is destructive, destructive, dismantlinge.
  It has been called and created by an epoch and system of disassembly of the Soviet socialism. To change for itself former system! - here there was its first purpose. And further supposedly itself somehow will go.
  As has gone - you observe.
  THE ESSENCE OF RUSSIAN OLIGARCHY IS CRIMINAL, -
  Because any oligarch will not tell, where it has taken money for purchasing of the milliard operations below a market price, and to whom has bribed in what moulding box to receive a tidbit. Etc.

  The oligarch likes Native land, and this love a constituent includes love and a capability of its robbery. So the predator can invite in restaurant the rich lady on at it select money.